The Rhetorical Analysis of Sherman Alexie’s Indian Education
This assignment is about the short story “Indian Education” by Sherman Alexie and the Rhetorical devices he uses within it. My audience consists of my professor; my fellow classmates, and whomever else may be reading this Rhetorical Analysis. This is a final draft, so that means revisions and corrections were made to my half draft in order to make this draft better than the last. I had a total of five people revise it in the course of two weeks and they were all helpful. The one thing that nearly all of them pointed out was the fact that I had a poorly written thesis statement. By writing a better thesis statement, my final draft instantly sounded better and was easier to understand. I also added in some of the other rhetorical devices such as irony, symbolism, and juxtaposition that Alexie uses that I had not mentioned in my half draft.
Sherman Alexie wrote “Indian Education”, and does a splendid job at showing different types of rhetorical devices, such as ethos, pathos, logos, symbolism, irony, and even hyperbole. Even though Alexie faced many struggles because he was different, he still had the strength and willpower to receive a good education and he uses several rhetorical devices to help show his life over the years. The story takes place in an Indian Reservation, as well as a predominantly white school outside of the reservation. This memoir shows what life was like for an Indian boy going to school and being bullied. It shows how Alexie overcame his obstacles to be someone greater than expected of him. It tells about how Alexie proves the Indian stereotypes wrong.
In “Indian Education”, he talks about his life during his years of schooling. His life was not easy, because his parents were the typical Indian parents that drank and cried all the time. He went to school outside of the Indian reservation. He wanted the education that most in his tribe would not get. Alexie’s audience could be aimed toward Indian people that have suffered through racism or it could be aimed toward white people that don’t understand Indian culture. His persona is one that shows strength and willpower. He had to have the strength to get through school. Sherman Alexie is someone who has the authority to write about the struggles of being an Indian student in school, because he was one of those Indian students. He had to live through the racist comments and stereotypical thoughts of other people around him. For example, his teacher criticized him in second grade for having long hair. She told Alexie’s parents to cut his hair or keep him home from class. His parents came to school and flaunted there long braids across the teacher’s desk. She said “indian, indian, indian.” Alexie responded with “ Yes I am, I am Indian. Indian, I am.” (Alexie) He was strong and I was very proud of his ethnicity. All of these are examples of ethos, the ethical appeal.
Another rhetorical device that is used is pathos, which is the emotional appeal. The entire and short story evokes emotion, but here are a few examples throughout the story. In seventh grade, he talked about the white girl that he loved. Alexie ends up kissing the white girl and that was his way of saying goodbye to his tribe because it is a form or betrayal. He says “after that, no one spoke to me for another five hundred years.” which is yet another rhetorical device that Alexie use, because obviously they didn’t stop talking to him for 500 years.(Lone Ranger) Alexie says in the short story that He stated that she was raped by her foster-parent father. When the newspaper wrote about it, it did not mention anything about their color of skin. The newspaper had said “Just Indians being Indians”. (Alexie) A Juxtaposition is shown when Alexie says “I sat back and watched them grow skinny from self-pity. But we ate it day after day and grew skinny from self-pity.” Alexie says that the girls at his school suffer from anorexia and bulimia. He would ask them for food because they did not have enough as a family. His mother would stand in long lines to receive canned beef that the dogs would not eat. Alexie wants the audience to show sympathy and empathy toward ethnic children in the school system.
Alexie also appeals to the logical side of things (logos). In fourth grade, his teacher said to him “You should be a doctor when you grow up.” (Alexie) Alexie asked his teacher why he should become a doctor. His teacher responded to him by saying that he could really help out the people in his tribe if he become a doctor. That year, he would go home and talk to his reflection in the mirror and say “Dr. Victor to the emergency room.” (Alexie) Dr. Victor is a symbol of the need for someone to heal the tribe. Alexie became as successful as he did because of that teacher that saw something great in him. And because his teacher saw something good in him, he saw something good in himself as well.
Alexie graduates and he is at the top of his class. He looks at his indian peers that can barely read and he realizes that all they are going to do is go to the tavern every other night to drink. He even says “Why should we organize a reservation high school reunion? My graduating class has a reunion every weekend at the Powwow Tavern.” (Alexie) Alexie uses yet another form of juxtaposition by saying “I tried to remain stoic for the photographers as I look toward the future.” and “ They smile for the photographer as they look back toward tradition.” (Alexie) Alexie states that he pretended to look happy for his pictures, but in reality, he does not know what he was going to do with his life. Right after he admits that, he says that everyone else smiles because they have no doubt about their lives. They will follow the Indian tradition ways. They will end up living the exact lives their parents lived and that does not scare them at all. That’s the difference between Alexie and the rest of his class, Alexie was very scared of becoming exactly like his parents and that’s why he pursued a better education.
Alexie has to deal with all of this first hand. He did not need evidence to support his claims. He lived it; this was his life. No evidence is greater than first-hand evidence. He had no idea what was next in his life after graduation. He wrote “ The bright students are shaken, frightened, because they don’t know what comes next.” (Alexie) Alexie never knew what he truly wanted, all he knew was that he wanted to prove the stereotypes wrong. He wanted everyone to know that even someone from his background could leave the reservation and become successful in life.
